http://jay.shao.org/2008/03/10/jsr-286-is-official-does-it-matter/ Thoughts and Ruminations, where I write about personal things, work, eLearning, Jasig, uPortal, Sakai, Portlets, and other topics or commentary as it takes my fancy. Wed, 24 Feb 2010 18:12:43 -0400 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 http://jay.shao.org/2008/03/10/jsr-286-is-official-does-it-matter/comment-page-1/#comment-1995 jayshao Mon, 28 Jul 2008 18:01:30 +0000 http://jay.shao.org/archives/2008/03/10/jsr-286-is-official-does-it-matter#comment-1995 <p>I tend to agree, but given that portlets are inherently container local, whereas the new ones are network protocal-ish, I wonder if portlets are being relegated to "legacy" standards support. Afterall, if you can write to a ubiquitous, cross-platform standard, why bother with other ones?</p> I tend to agree, but given that portlets are inherently container local, whereas the new ones are network protocal-ish, I wonder if portlets are being relegated to “legacy” standards support. Afterall, if you can write to a ubiquitous, cross-platform standard, why bother with other ones?

]]> http://jay.shao.org/2008/03/10/jsr-286-is-official-does-it-matter/comment-page-1/#comment-1626 afilimonov Tue, 24 Jun 2008 22:04:10 +0000 http://jay.shao.org/archives/2008/03/10/jsr-286-is-official-does-it-matter#comment-1626 <p>It looks like major portal vendors are actively moving beyond portlet specification by adding new content aggregation models. I believe that portlets will continue to exist but just like one of the many available options.</p> It looks like major portal vendors are actively moving beyond portlet specification by adding new content aggregation models. I believe that portlets will continue to exist but just like one of the many available options.

]]>